|
位置：首页 >> 期刊文章
|
|
摘要：
|
|
本文通过分析说明：（１） 孔隙水压推算的固结度与沉降推算固结度相差较大是合理的；（２） 合理的理论沉降过程线与实测沉降过程线不相交且它们有相同的 Ｓ∞；（３） 沉降推算的指数曲线法给出的固结度偏高。
|
|
In this paper,several problems are analyzed. First, a certain difference existed between the degree of consolidation calculated through porewater pressure and the degree of consolidation calculated through settlement is reasonable; second, the reasonable theoretical settlement curve and the measured settlement curve are non intersecting and have same values of S ∞; third, the degree of consolidation given in the index curve method of classic theory with settlement is higher than that of other methods actually.
|
|
基金项目：
|
|
|
|
作者简介：
|
|
|
|
参考文献：
|
|
1 林本义对由实测沉降过程线推算固结参数法的探讨水运工程,1992 ,1
2 魏汝龙从实测沉降过程推算固结系数岩土工程学报,1993 ,2
3 沈珠江软土工程特性和软土地基设计岩土工程学报,1998 ,1
4 Terzaghi , Peck , Mesri Soil Mechnical in Engineering Practice1995
5 禄藩闭婵赵ぱ够硌芯渴戟备劭诠こ?1991 ,4
6 天津大学土力学与地基人民交通出版社,1980
7 朱胜利由实测沉降曲线推算地基最终沉降量的双曲线法港口工程,1998
|
|
服务与反馈：
|
|
【文章下载】【加入收藏】
|
|
|
|
|